An alternative reason for keeping it is the KLM stewardesses (at least the last time I went on a Fokker 100 I was suitably impressed). I don't really agree with the article...that's why I had to find alternative reasoning:-) Although my standpoint has a strong degree of bias.
The model is looking good! What tool have you been using? On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 16:01, Erik Hofman wrote: > Ha, this is the result of three days of practicing for a 3d model of a > fokker 100 (and the aeromatic model to match): > > http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/gallery/fokker/ > > Erik > > http://www.rekkof.nl/fokker100/index_fokker_100.htm > > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Christopher S Horler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
