Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: <snip> > It seems to me, therefore, that debating eye-candy vs. dynamic/procedureal > accuracy is a waste of time, and possibly harmful because the people who > want to work in the area expounded by the side that loses the debate > aren't suddenly going to start working in the area expounded by the side > that wins it. They're more likely to start working for a different > project where they feel that what they want to work on will be welcome. > > I welcome all improvements to FG. >
I'll second that! Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
