An open standard is a good idea but when it comes to looking at new 3d model formts I think we ought to be thinking about what features it can cope with - for example, the ability to use multiple textures per surface/object would add a lot of versitility.
While we may not be able to actually impliment multiple textures right now, we ought to allow for them in any standard we decide to use.
I think an open and extensible standard would be ideal.
Well, here is a standard that *you* can actually try to influence ...
BTW. XML makes extending the existent layout without influencing the previous versions possible by nature.
Erik
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
