On Thursday 27 May 2004 21:51, Jim Wilson wrote: > Lee Elliott said: > > I think a survey would be a good idea, for the same reason I suggested > > something like a wiki for doing it - without making sure that every > > possibility is in some way catered for some things could be excluded or > > impossible. > > > > I don't hold any strong opinions about it really - just things that have > > occurred to me while developing & testing FG a/c, but a complete > > re-mapping might, or might not be a good idea - I just don't think that > > all the requirements have been identified yet and until then any progress > > or decisions are likely to miss something. > > Oh, well that's just a jaded programmer responding to the word > "comprehensive" > > :-). What I should have said is that a proposal and RFC on the list would > : be > > better for me as a format. Maybe not for others... > > Best, > > Jim
;) oops - I'll try to remember not to use the 'c' word again:) LeeE _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
