On Thursday 27 May 2004 21:51, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Lee Elliott said:
> > I think a survey would be a good idea, for the same reason I suggested
> > something like a wiki for doing it - without making sure that every
> > possibility is in some way catered for some things could be excluded or
> > impossible.
> >
> > I don't hold any strong opinions about it really - just things that have
> > occurred to me while developing & testing FG a/c, but a complete
> > re-mapping might, or might not be a good idea - I just don't think that
> > all the requirements have been identified yet and until then any progress
> > or decisions are likely to miss something.
>
> Oh, well that's just a jaded programmer responding to the word
> "comprehensive"
>
> :-).  What I should have said is that a proposal and RFC on the list would
> : be
>
> better for me as a format.  Maybe not for others...
>
> Best,
>
> Jim

;)   oops - I'll try to remember not to use the 'c' word again:)

LeeE


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to