Hi Vivian,
On 09 May 2011, at 00:46, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> I’m afraid that the “improved textures” really aren’t an improvement. Not
> only do they not work for taxiways, we have also lost the chevrons at the
> threshold that were quite recently added:
>
> https://picasaweb.google.com/gijsrooy/FlightGearSkyopSTextures#5604420979421192098
>
> The grass isn’t much of an improvement either. On balance, this upload is a
> regression. IMO we should back it out.
>
>
Thanks for the report. A missing feature would certainly be a good argument to
back out this commit (and I have to admit that I had completely missed that).
With respect to the aesthetics, I personally didn't see that many differences,
so I had to rely on the evaluation from others, which were generally positive
in my reading. I will have a look into the chevron / taxiway issue, although it
may take a few days before I'm actually taking action. So if others want to
comment, please do so.
Cheers,
Durk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
