In a message dated 5/15/05 3:34:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


i still think we have to work on defining/redefining fluxus, at least to get a Fluxlist definition of Fluxus.


I think what makes Fluxus so dynamic and interesting to me is that there is no definition- I wish people would just accept that. The appealing idea is that Fluxus is inclusive. Artists spend most of their careers being rejected which is why Fluxus is so refreshing--or should I just go be a Neoist?? Dawg

Reply via email to