On 2001.12.12 16:11 Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Are there any discussions on how to reorganize fop on a more scalable > framework? > Maybe going to SAX or other internal representations? > Sorry for the questions, I'm not able to check the list arcives right > now.
Yes there have been. This is important information that needs to be more accessible. Briefly the idea is to keep information minimal and use/dispose of any data as soon as possible, failing that a simple caching mechanism will be available. > What are the plans for FOP. > Are the releases giong to be so slowly incremental? > I'm really in the need of enhancements on the performance side and I > don't > know where to start. > I also needed something that could render fo dynamically but FOP is not > made > for this... > How can I help regarding these issues? I think first you need to understand what is goind on. So we need to provide information: - what the plans and issues are - what is currently being done I will be working on this! Then should have a better idea and you can then ask more specific questions. For now getting a general idea of the code might help you get started. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
