Jeremias Maerki wrote: > On 18.02.2003 22:07:13 J.Pietschmann wrote: > <snip/> > > The LPPL'd hyphenation have to be checked thouroughly because > > of LPPL 1. Condition 2 does not apply. Condition 7 is fulfilled > > by keeping the file under LPPL. 3 is probably trivially ok as > > mentioned above. 4, 5 and 6 can be easily checked and corrected, > > and 8(B) should be easy too. I can look into it this weekend. > > Thank you, that'd be great! It didn't occur to me that we could leave > the licence of some source files as is. I thought that would only apply > to third-party JARs. Nonetheless, before I'd like to allow any LPPL file > to reside in our repository I want the approval from the board or > licencing@. At least the process of officially approving other licences > and publishing the results for all to see has kicked off.
I don't think the LPPL works at all for us. The preamble says: "You may distribute a complete, unmodified copy of The Program. Distribution of only part of The Program is not allowed." Victor Mote --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
