Jeremias Maerki wrote:

> On 18.02.2003 22:07:13 J.Pietschmann wrote:
> <snip/>
> > The LPPL'd hyphenation have to be checked thouroughly because
> > of LPPL 1. Condition 2 does not apply. Condition 7 is fulfilled
> > by keeping the file under LPPL. 3 is probably trivially ok as
> > mentioned above. 4, 5 and 6 can be easily checked and corrected,
> > and 8(B) should be easy too. I can look into it this weekend.
> Thank you, that'd be great! It didn't occur to me that we could leave
> the licence of some source files as is. I thought that would only apply
> to third-party JARs. Nonetheless, before I'd like to allow any LPPL file
> to reside in our repository I want the approval from the board or
> licencing@. At least the process of officially approving other licences
> and publishing the results for all to see has kicked off.

I don't think the LPPL works at all for us. The preamble says: "You may
distribute a complete, unmodified copy of The Program. Distribution of only
part of The Program is not allowed."

Victor Mote

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to