Hi Chris, Chris Bowditch a écrit : > Vincent Hennebert wrote: > >> Well it seems that target-resolution would also be fine for AFP. >> Actually, by looking at the doc it seems that this parameter actually >> has 2 different purposes: the resolution of the output when FOP produces >> bitmap images, and the resolution of images produced by Batik (although >> I don’t really get that latter). >> >> It will perhaps make sense to separate those 2 purposes and make the >> former renderer-specific. Something like “output-resolution” would make >> sense to me. “target-resolution” would be kept as a general setting and >> would only apply to Batik. >> >> Does that make sense? > > Everything except the names. I think it makes sense to have one general > purpose resolution setting and then renderer specific settings which > control renderer specific resolution. In the case of AFP this will > affect more than just imgaes, but for other renderers we are just > talking about images.
Hmmm, I’m perhaps making a confusion here. I thought target-resolution did also apply to the whole images generated by the renderer; i.e., for the TIFF renderer, the resolution of the image representing the whole document, and not only images inside it. Isn’t that the case? Then, why wouldn’t target-resolution also apply to images in PDF output? Perhaps I should ask the question on fop-user, I’m sure I will find there nice developers who will enlighten me... > "output" and "target" have similar semantics in > the English language and the distinction between them will not be clear > enough for the users. Maybe the general purpose one (which currently > only controls batik) should be "default-resolution" and it could also > apply to images for renderers which dont have an explicit > "renderer-resolution" renderer-resolution sounds fine to me. Vincent