Hi Glenn, Glenn Adams wrote: > more > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Glenn Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Vincent Hennebert >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hi Glenn, >>> >>> From you first message I had the impression that you wanted to keep >>> using that tool for future documentation >>> >> as i've said, i intend to transition the documentation to the FOP wiki over >> a period of time, so that it will all end up on the latter >> > > we've pretty much exhausted this thread, but perhaps it would be clearer to > you if you view the trac wiki site I am using as a "working copy", "sandbox" > or as a "staging area" as I compose my ideas and documentation; i could have > merely done it on my local drive or on a private server, but i preferred > instead to make it visible early, even though it is in preliminary stage > which does not meet the standards I would expect for documentation that is > promoted to the FOP wiki; i very well may rip up, rewrite, replace, > restructure, etc., the content i am composing on my trac wiki before i feel > it is ready for the FOP wiki; as I say, i could be doing that privately, but > then interested viewers would not have early access to my preliminary work; > overall, it is to your and the communities benefit that i choose to expose > this preliminary work, with all its defects plainly visible;
That’s fair enough, but you’re describing the very purpose of the FOP wiki here :-) Moreover, notification is sent to the fop-commits mailing list whenever a change is made to the wiki, which allows us to easily follow people’s progress. Vincent
