more On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Vincent Hennebert <vhenneb...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi Glenn, >> >> From you first message I had the impression that you wanted to keep >> using that tool for future documentation >> > > as i've said, i intend to transition the documentation to the FOP wiki over > a period of time, so that it will all end up on the latter > we've pretty much exhausted this thread, but perhaps it would be clearer to you if you view the trac wiki site I am using as a "working copy", "sandbox" or as a "staging area" as I compose my ideas and documentation; i could have merely done it on my local drive or on a private server, but i preferred instead to make it visible early, even though it is in preliminary stage which does not meet the standards I would expect for documentation that is promoted to the FOP wiki; i very well may rip up, rewrite, replace, restructure, etc., the content i am composing on my trac wiki before i feel it is ready for the FOP wiki; as I say, i could be doing that privately, but then interested viewers would not have early access to my preliminary work; overall, it is to your and the communities benefit that i choose to expose this preliminary work, with all its defects plainly visible; g.
