Thanks Tony! I'll look into that. And nice to hear from you after many years.
Best, Glenn On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Tony Graham <tgra...@mentea.net> wrote: > On Tue, October 25, 2011 11:29 pm, Glenn Adams wrote: > > They (latin ligatures) are already enabled, so no extra work is needed. > > Though this could benefit by adding support for some of the more recent > > CSS3 > > font properties related to the use of AATs, e.g., see [1] for: > > > > font-variant-alternates > > font-variant-ligatures > > font-feature-settings > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-fonts/ > > FWIW, the XSL 2.0 Requirements includes several requirements for better > font support [1], including font choice based on script or language and > font-specific features (i.e., OpenType features). > > The work to date on improved font support hasn't made it into the current > Working Draft [3][4], but I, personally, don't see anything wrong with > anyone who can articulate specific needs for improved font support in > XSL-FO 2.0 submitting a pre-emptive comment about it on the W3C Bugzilla > [2]. > > Regards, > > > Tony Graham tgra...@mentea.net > Consultant http://www.mentea.net > Mentea 13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- > XML, XSL-FO and XSLT consulting, training and programming > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20-req/#N66770 > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/01/xsl-fo-bugzilla.html > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-xslfo20-20110927/ > [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/xslfo20/ >
