Mike Muir wrote:
> Nate Williams wrote:
> > I was under the impression that 4.x hasn't been designated as the stable
> > branch (yet).  That will happen when 4.1 is released, but until that
> > happens 3.x is still considered the -stable release.
> That would kinda make sense since cvsuping with tag=RELENG_3 seems to
> give me FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE (#0: Sat Apr 22 20:59:03 PDT 2000)..

Ok wait im a moron.. been using the stable-supfile instead of the
4.x-stable-supfile.. hmmmmm.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to