3-Авг-2006 17:53 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to

>>the final FD 1.0 should probably wait for upcoming Emm386 v2.22 to be
>>released  :) .
MD> Barring the fileset I requested, or other testable indication that your
MD> problem occurs with anyone else, I should not think that would be a
MD> problem.

     If you again miss my report, try to use "G" suffix (as far, as I see,
it supported through GetValue() by EMM=, MIN=, FRAME=, /P, MAX=, I= and X=
in EMM386 and /NUMHANDLES, /MAX=, /HMAMIN= and /INT15= in HIMEM).

MD> In other words, no need to wait for EMM386 3.0 - codenamed "The
MD> Arkady Factor".

     I think, build subsystem _should_ be _added_ before "final" EMM386
version will be released - else, because "no more permanent, than
temporary", EMM386 may never get build subsystem, which allows to 3rdp party
developers to properly check their patches before submitting.

Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
Freedos-user mailing list

Reply via email to