Hi!
3-Авг-2006 17:53 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
[email protected]:
>>the final FD 1.0 should probably wait for upcoming Emm386 v2.22 to be
>>released :) .
MD> Barring the fileset I requested, or other testable indication that your
MD> problem occurs with anyone else, I should not think that would be a
MD> problem.
If you again miss my report, try to use "G" suffix (as far, as I see,
it supported through GetValue() by EMM=, MIN=, FRAME=, /P, MAX=, I= and X=
in EMM386 and /NUMHANDLES, /MAX=, /HMAMIN= and /INT15= in HIMEM).
MD> In other words, no need to wait for EMM386 3.0 - codenamed "The
MD> Arkady Factor".
I think, build subsystem _should_ be _added_ before "final" EMM386
version will be released - else, because "no more permanent, than
temporary", EMM386 may never get build subsystem, which allows to 3rdp party
developers to properly check their patches before submitting.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
