Eric Auer schrieb: > Hi Robert, Travis, > > Robert wrote: > >>> Would you want a compressed filesystem at all? >>> My discouraging answer: I just don't need it. > >>> I think, what FreeDOS needs for daily use is a good graphical web >>> browser, a nice e-mailer, a word processor like Abiword, FOSS USB >>> drivers, ... > > In what way would FreeDOS differ from Linux 2.4 then? > Apart from being worse in performance, multitasking, > having no GUI, no way to show several apps at once...
Simple, small, DOS compatible, fast booting, modular, easy to understand, stable. > Without complex tricks, you only get EITHER bootable OR > writeable compressed filesystems if you ask me... Non-writeable makes it less useful. Non-bootable is bad but may be tricked with known workarrounds (suggestions already made about this topic). -mr ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
