Hi Adrian,
Consider this: with carrier per user instead of timeslot per user, you
don't have the distance limitation that TDMA introduces.
I think that's more a limitation of existing protocols. For example we
could design a TDMA protocol to handle longer distances, or use probe
packets to measure the propagation delay and compensate (e.g. send
schedule tx for a later timeslot).
OFDMA sounds interesting, I'll look into it some time.
I agree with Glen - mFSK is just a small change to 2FSK in terms on
implementation complexity.
>Meanwhile people tend to disregard open
>source projects as inferior, so getting traction won't happen soon.
Perhaps in today's Ham community, however in the wider fields of
engineering and IT open source is generally regarded as superior - for
good reason.
Cheers,
David
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
