Perhaps it is possible. However, we have repeaters around here with more than 200 km coverage radius, and I don't see TDMA solving both capacity and coverage. Time will tell.
Glen, thanks for expanding on LTE. I am not deeply familiar with the LTE PHY and I don't intend to copy it, just botrow some ideas. best regards, Wdrian > >I think that's more a limitation of existing protocols. For example we > >could design a TDMA protocol to handle longer distances, or use probe >packets to measure the propagation delay and compensate (e.g. send >schedule tx for a later timeslot). > >OFDMA sounds interesting, I'll look into it some time. > >I agree with Glen - mFSK is just a small change to 2FSK in terms on >implementation complexity. > > >Meanwhile people tend to disregard open > >source projects as inferior, so getting traction won't happen soon. > >Perhaps in today's Ham community, however in the wider fields of >engineering and IT open source is generally regarded as superior - for >good reason. > >Cheers, > >David > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >_______________________________________________ >Freetel-codec2 mailing list >Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2 -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list Freetel-codec2@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
