Yes, I think we should. Marc Krahenbuhl Lausanne Suisse mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wim Godden wrote: > Well, I have a very interesting read for everyone on this list : > > First I received a mail about ProVSD. I then asked : > "Is ProVSD the continuation of FreeVSD or a completely new product rewritten from > scratch ?" > > The reply was : > "ProVSD is a new product but it is not rewritten from scratch but is the > commercial version of freeVSD. > > freeVSD was open source and since then we have made an enormous amount of > modifications to VSD, now ProVSD. It has a lot more functionality and > expandability than freeVSD and all information regarding the latest release > can be found on our new website www.idaya.com" > > My reply : > "Since freeVSD was released as GPL, where can I obtain the source code for ProVSD > ?" > > Reply from Idaya : > "As ProVSD has now been launched commercially, it is no longer under the GPL > code. We now own the source and it is closed I am afraid. Apologies if this > has caused any inconvenience." > > And finally my reply : > "Code that has been released as GPL, can never be released as closed source > later. Therefor, you are legally obliged to release the code. > > Additionally, you don't own the full source of freeVSD. Part of the source code > was written by non-Idaya-employees. The code is owned by their original creators > and released underl GPL by them. As a result, you can't charge money for that > code, nor can you make it closed source." > > Anyone want to file a complaint at the Free Software Foundation for violation of > GPL ? > > Dave Cost wrote: > > > Tim, > > > > when will the 1.4.10 be available to the open-source community? > > I'm concerned with the tactics idaya is taking to promote its ProVSD stuff > > :-(( > > > > Dave. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Sellar > > Sent: marted� 27 novembre 2001 0.58 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: RH 7.2 pkgs & protftpd > > > > We intend to get freeVSD to a stage where it requires as few patched files > > as possible. We implemented pam_vsd in order to remove patches which simply > > checked against the vsd privilege file. ProFTP is an example of this, so > > from 1.4.10 a patched version of ProFTP is not required... > > > > Tim > > > > ------------------------- The freeVSD Support List -------------------------- > > Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=subscribe%20freevsd-support > > Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe%20freevsd-support > > Archives: http://freevsd.org/support/mail-archives/freevsd-support > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------- The freeVSD Support List -------------------------- > Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=subscribe%20freevsd-support > Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe%20freevsd-support > Archives: http://freevsd.org/support/mail-archives/freevsd-support > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- The freeVSD Support List -------------------------- Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=subscribe%20freevsd-support Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=unsubscribe%20freevsd-support Archives: http://freevsd.org/support/mail-archives/freevsd-support -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
