I've never liked the explanation of the game as a "prisoner's dilemma"--so I
never explain it that way. But I think it's a great illustration of how
iterative interactions can differ from one-shot interactions.


-- Russ Abbott
______________________________________

 Professor, Computer Science
 California State University, Los Angeles

 cell:  310-621-3805
 blog: http://russabbott.blogspot.com/
 vita:  http://sites.google.com/site/russabbott/
______________________________________



On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:41 PM, George Duncan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, think of the two prisoners, say Bonnie and Clyde, as having some sort
> of relationship. I, along with many, teach that the label "cooperate"
> supports this relationship while "defect" undermines the relationship. See
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner's_dilemma<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner%27s_dilemma>
>  and
> http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/prisoner-dilemma/ for more or less
> standard terminology. Note in the latter that in the payoff matrix we have S
> < P < R < T (hey, the SPiRiT of the Prisoner's Dilemma). I didn't find
> students to find this confusing, at least at Carnegie Mellon in public
> policy.
>
> George
>
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Ted Carmichael <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Maybe that's the problem ... the orientation of the cooperate/defect
>> decision is always pair-wise between two prisoners.  Perhaps it's not as
>> confusing that way.
>>
>> -T
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Nicholas Thompson <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>  I ferociously disagree.  I found that students were always confused by
>>> it.  In the first place, the four payoff boxes are misnamed because, "to
>>> cooperate" in that situation means to cooperate with the police, hence to
>>> defect.   "Defect" is also a misleading term.
>>>
>>> I also don't see how the cooperation dilemma is different from the
>>> prisonners dilemma.  Just change the headings to sheep grazed on the common
>>> and the payoffs to sheep weight gain and everything else remains the same.
>>>
>>> N
>>>
>>>  Nicholas S. Thompson
>>> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
>>> Clark University ([email protected])
>>> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/<http://home.earthlink.net/%7Enickthompson/naturaldesigns/>
>>> http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>> *From:* George Duncan <[email protected]>
>>>  *To: *[email protected];The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
>>> Coffee Group <[email protected]>
>>> *Sent:* 4/3/2010 3:47:52 PM
>>> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Slashdot Science Story | Twins' DNA Foils Police
>>>
>>>   Nick,
>>>
>>> I find that the Prisoner's Dilemma is a useful way of thinking about how
>>> people's behavior can be manipulated by those with some control over the
>>> reward structure (say the prosecutor). And a PhD student (now professor) and
>>> I (now artist) did a paper on what someone without such control (say the
>>> defense attorney) can do to get them out of the prosecutor's trap.
>>>
>>> The Tragedy of the Commons is different, and a really useful way of
>>> thinking about the need in some cases for social controls to promote
>>> cooperation.
>>>
>>> I do find that students still find the Prisoner's Dilemma cute, maybe
>>> even opens up there minds a bit to how social decision making differs from
>>> individual decision making.
>>>
>>> George
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Nicholas Thompson <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  George,
>>>>
>>>> you are, of course, absolutely correct.
>>>>
>>>> That is always a weakness to the PD story, which is, at base, a really
>>>> stupid way to think about cooperation issues.  It is one of those ideas
>>>> which was sort of cute at the time, got into all the text books, and has
>>>> been drilled into the heads of two generations of students, but really
>>>> doesnt adequately represent the crucial variables in the situation and
>>>> should have been dropped about two decades ago.   It is a case of 
>>>> scientific
>>>> mob thinking at its absolute worst.
>>>>
>>>> The tragedy of the commons model is much clearer and avoids all the
>>>> cutsy language that has been promoted by people who know bfa about 
>>>> prisoners
>>>> and their dilemmas.
>>>>
>>>> Nick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Nicholas S. Thompson
>>>> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
>>>> Clark University ([email protected])
>>>> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/<http://home.earthlink.net/%7Enickthompson/naturaldesigns/>
>>>> http://www.cusf.org [City University of Santa Fe]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>> *From:* George Duncan <[email protected]>
>>>> *To: *The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group<[email protected]>
>>>>   *Sent:* 4/3/2010 3:11:29 PM
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Slashdot Science Story | Twins' DNA Foils Police
>>>>
>>>> What makes this not a Prisoner's Dilemma is there is no incentive for
>>>> James to rat on John and no incentive for John to rat on James.  James and
>>>> John have an optimal strategy of stonewalling.
>>>>
>>>> Poor prosecutor! Hard to see how the prosecutor can set up a Prisoner's
>>>> Dilemma here, at least without deception.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Owen Densmore <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Now here's a new twist on the Prisoner's Dilemma:
>>>>>    http://slashdot.org/story/10/04/03/1539224/
>>>>>
>>>>>    -- Owen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ============================================================
>>>>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>>>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>>>>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> George Duncan
>>>> georgeduncanart.com
>>>> represented by Artistas de Santa Fe
>>>> www.artistasdesantafe.com
>>>> (505) 983-6895
>>>>
>>>> Life must be understood backwards; but... it must be lived forward.
>>>> Soren Kierkegaard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ============================================================
>>>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>>>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> George Duncan
>>> georgeduncanart.com
>>> represented by Artistas de Santa Fe
>>> www.artistasdesantafe.com
>>> (505) 983-6895
>>>
>>> Life must be understood backwards; but... it must be lived forward.
>>> Soren Kierkegaard
>>>
>>>
>>> ============================================================
>>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> George Duncan
> georgeduncanart.com
> represented by Artistas de Santa Fe
> www.artistasdesantafe.com
> (505) 983-6895
>
> Life must be understood backwards; but... it must be lived forward.
> Soren Kierkegaard
>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to