+1

M
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Spencer
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 11:38 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] Re: gloomy America



Mike G. wrote:

mg> Yes, and it has been a very long time since I read Marx on this but 
mg> I have a feeling that what we are seeing is a qualitatively more 
mg> advanced form of distortion... One where the bad guys are able to 
mg> actually get in and manipulate at a level of detail (informed by 
mg> neuroscience, psychology, anthropology etc.) that the Churches etc. 
mg> were not sufficiently sophisticated to be able to achieve.

to which Lawry responded:

LdB> Michael, can you say more about what you mean here by 
LdB> "neuroscience"?

An intro of sorts can be found on Wikipedia at:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromarketing

from which this squib:

    In a study from the group of Read Montague published in 2004 in
    Neuron,[7] 67 people had their brains scanned while being given
    the "Pepsi Challenge", a blind taste test of Coca-Cola and
    Pepsi. Half the subjects chose Pepsi, since Pepsi tended to
    produce a stronger response than Coke in their brain's
    ventromedial prefrontal cortex, a region thought to process
    feelings of reward. But when the subjects were told they were
    drinking Coke three-quarters said that Coke tasted better. Their
    brain activity had also changed. The lateral prefrontal cortex, an
    area of the brain that scientists say governs high-level cognitive
    powers, and the hippocampus, an area related to memory, were now
    being used, indicating that the consumers were thinking about Coke
    and relating it to memories and other impressions. The results
    demonstrated that Pepsi should have half the market share, but in
    reality consumers are buying Coke for reasons related less to
    their taste preferences and more to their experience with the Coke
    brand.

An early run at this kind of thing was non-therapeutic applications of
notions proposed by Bandler & Grinder 30 or so years ago that they called
Neuro-linguistic Programming. NLP hasn't held up very well under scrutiny
but the notion of outsmarting  T. C. Mits [1] by end-running his nervous
system seems to be alive and flourishing.

See also: neuroeconomics

- Mike


[1] The Celebrated Man in the street

-- 
Michael Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada       .~. 
                                                           /V\ 
[email protected]                                     /( )\
http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/                        ^^-^^
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to