Yes. I briefly wondered if OS X might make more use of the cache that OS 9, but then I remembered how incredibly slow my 8500 G3 was with OS 9 and cache disabled. More likely, it's a timing thing. That's a common explanation for why OS X is fussier about memory, so it probably true of cache, as well.
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 12:02 PM, Richard Starr wrote: > It is probably worth playing with cache speed, but 2:1 works > perfectly in 9.2 > so one would wish it would in 10.2.2. Maybe I'm dreaming. -- G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock! | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> G-List list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
