In a message dated 6/30/05 2:20:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Oh geez. Do you REALLY believe that OS X is less reliable and less efficient than OS 9? If so, cite specific examples to support your claim. >>
Im just saying, thats what were talking about here. My only specific example is how slow and how badly OS X multitasks on my 450MHz sawtooth with plenty of graphics power and plenty of ram. But as Bruce pointed out my Ultra 160 drive could be slowing things down. i kind of doubt thats the problem but I guess its possible. Like I said, I have a java app that ran extremely fast in OS 9 but extremely slow in OS X. Im a little confused to see how that could be poorly written. I blame it on the OS because that is what has changed. Anyway, I think its pretty obvious that OS X has some performance issues at this point, with it being pointed out that there are things in OS X over Unix which degrades performance dramatically. Chris -- G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock! | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> G-List list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/> iPod Accessories for Less at 1-800-iPOD.COM Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal www.1800ipod.com
