On Thursday, June 30, 2005, at 03:19 PM, Daniel wrote:
On Jun 30, 2005, at 15:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Oh geez. Do you REALLY believe that OS X is less reliable and less
efficient than OS 9? If so, cite specific examples to support your
claim.
Daniel
Not that simple Daniel. OSX is purposely "less reliable and
efficient" than it could be with very little more effort on Apple's
part.
For example --- (May not still be the case with Tiger) --- the
'STANDARD' advice to 'rebuild the Desktop' ------ IF they would fix
those little annoying glitch type problems, instead of shoving them
under the carpet, there WOULD BE NO NEED TO EVER REBUILD THE DESKTOP.
(Yeah I'm shouting. I can't believe the 'good quiet sheep' attitude of
Mac users, not raising hell about such sloppy programming attitudes.)
JMHO
Chuck D.
--
G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...
Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives |
-- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock! | & CDRWs on Sale! |
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
G-List list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml>
--> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to: <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
iPod Accessories for Less
at 1-800-iPOD.COM
Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal
www.1800ipod.com
