Yes they should. I think I mentioned before when I set that up that I was leaving them that way because it worked and they could be changed one at a time later. I changed around the timing CPU since I knew what I was doing in there and because it's the only timing CPU that supports x86 right now. If somebody would like to change either or both of the other models, that's what needs to happen.
Gabe Korey Sewell wrote: > > I didn't break anything that way, but it should really > be translateTiming(). > > I noticed that the O3 model still uses translateAtomic() as well and > meant to ask the list should the O3 model (and InOrder) really be > using the timing version of the TLBs.... > > Thoughts? > > > -- > ---------- > Korey L Sewell > Graduate Student - PhD Candidate > Computer Science & Engineering > University of Michigan > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
