Well, I dont think pretending to do the access would work for the TLB necessarily.
I can see that the actual size of the access is irrelevant for the TLB translation (right?). Maybe we can work around that. But what about the type of access? That comes from the memory access flags and the only object that knows those flags is the actual instruction object. So that seems to be the big problem there. On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 5:23 PM, nathan binkert <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's a legitimate problem. Would it work to pretend to do the access > > and save the request object for later? > > I think we should strive to do this. > > Nate > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > -- ---------- Korey L Sewell Graduate Student - PhD Candidate Computer Science & Engineering University of Michigan
_______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
