I don't have a problem with people starting an all women list specifically on this topic through whatever appropriate list serve service seems appropriate. It can make its own rules about participants. The impression I got was the proposal was to make *this* the all women list, which I oppose. With all back and forth one gets confused.
On 3/16/2011 7:59 PM, SlimVirgin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 17:52,<carolmoor...@verizon.net> wrote: >> I second. The problem is aggression and trying to impose one's agenda, and >> whether you are male, female, M2F transgender or F2M transgender, you can be >> aggressive and disruptive. (And I've been on a couple all women lists over >> the years where M2F transgenders were very aggressive, condescending and >> disruptive.) I don't see any agreement with Ms. Hale's proposal and I think >> we need to drop it. >> > It's true, though, that there are things I would post about Wikipedia > on a women-only list, if I could be 100 percent sure that's what it > was. And as if to prove that point, I just typed out an example, then > deleted it because I felt uncomfortable. :) So even if Laura's > proposal isn't being supported, I hope it gives food for thought. And > there's nothing to stop her from setting up such a list herself. > > Sarah > > > - _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
