On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 28, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>> public class MySQLManager
>> extends org.apache.sqoop.manager.MySQLManager {
>>
>> public MySQLManager(final SqoopOptions opts) {
>> super(opts);
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>> If all the code is like this it is absolutely ridiculous to have this at
>> Apache and not Cloudera.
>
> This is a code issue, which is up the the team
> (committers/pmc/community) doing the work. If they want to include
> such code it's up to them. They are doing the work.
>
> What's really at issue here is whether all (java) code at Apache MUST
> be under org.apache.* package structure or not. afaik there is
> currently no such requirement. If Apache decides to make it a
> requirement then great, I'm sure the Sqoop team will make the
> necessary changes.
Part of Incubation has always been the migration to the org.apache.* package
space. I still don't see why it's a requirement for Apache to house code
whose sole use is to provide backward compatible bindings for Cloudera's old
bindings.
> We should also give Arvind and the rest of the Sqoop community some
> indication how to proceed, given the voting period is completed.
A concern has been raised by IPMC members and an effort is being made to garner
consensus. The voting period is on hold.
Regards,
Alan
