On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Santiago Gala wrote:
> I'm ready to give +1 to people nominated which are missing them, but I
> could not find any posting telling if +1 are required, or are just to be
> considered a form of moral support.
> Could anybody clarify?
Personally: I do not care much for seconding - just that the person
accepts - simple voting is the true test in my personal opinion. And in a
crowd as vocal as this I trust that issues are raised in time to make sure
that seconding is non essential filtering mechanism.
But that is a personal opinion - not the nessesarily shared by the voting
volunteers opinion of that of the board or pmc.
So for next time 2003 - you have some options.
1- No seconding needed - just acceptance.
2- One seconding needed - and acceptance counts
as such too.
3- More than one needed.
4- None needed - except to override a veto..
5. ....
Dw.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
