#4 plus acceptance then? I would have assumed that acceptance is implied, but that is just me ;-)
Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:02 PM > To: Jakarta General List > Subject: Re: Nominations, +1s, ... > > > On 2/12/02 4:45 PM, "Scott Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Number 4. As little process as possible. > > Disagree - I think requiring acceptance by the candidate is > better, as then we can't 'force' someone onto the PMC when > they aren't looking :) > > > > > > Scott > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:22 AM > > [SNIP] > > >> > >> So for next time 2003 - you have some options. > >> > >> 1- No seconding needed - just acceptance. > >> 2- One seconding needed - and acceptance counts > >> as such too. > >> 3- More than one needed. > >> 4- None needed - except to override a veto.. > >> 5. .... > >> > > -- > Geir Magnusson Jr. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > System and Software Consulting > The question is : What is a Mahnamahna? > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:general-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
