On 2/12/02 4:45 PM, "Scott Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Number 4. As little process as possible. Disagree - I think requiring acceptance by the candidate is better, as then we can't 'force' someone onto the PMC when they aren't looking :) > > Scott > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:22 AM [SNIP] >> >> So for next time 2003 - you have some options. >> >> 1- No seconding needed - just acceptance. >> 2- One seconding needed - and acceptance counts >> as such too. >> 3- More than one needed. >> 4- None needed - except to override a veto.. >> 5. .... >> -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting The question is : What is a Mahnamahna? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
