On 2/12/02 5:02 PM, "Scott Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #4 plus acceptance then? I would have assumed that acceptance is > implied, but that is just me ;-) > Oh - I didn't, because it was called out specifically in #1 and #2... Yep. > Scott > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:02 PM >> To: Jakarta General List >> Subject: Re: Nominations, +1s, ... >> >> >> On 2/12/02 4:45 PM, "Scott Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Number 4. As little process as possible. >> >> Disagree - I think requiring acceptance by the candidate is >> better, as then we can't 'force' someone onto the PMC when >> they aren't looking :) >> >> >>> >>> Scott >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:22 AM >> >> [SNIP] >> >>>> >>>> So for next time 2003 - you have some options. >>>> >>>> 1- No seconding needed - just acceptance. >>>> 2- One seconding needed - and acceptance counts >>>> as such too. >>>> 3- More than one needed. >>>> 4- None needed - except to override a veto.. >>>> 5. .... >>>> >> >> -- >> Geir Magnusson Jr. >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> System and Software Consulting >> The question is : What is a Mahnamahna? >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> <mailto:general-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> For >> additional commands, >> e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting "He who throws mud only loses ground." - Fat Albert -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
