Number 4. As little process as possible. Scott
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:22 AM > To: Jakarta General List > Subject: Re: Nominations, +1s, ... > > > > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Santiago Gala wrote: > > > I'm ready to give +1 to people nominated which are missing > them, but I > > could not find any posting telling if +1 are required, or > are just to > > be considered a form of moral support. > > > Could anybody clarify? > > Personally: I do not care much for seconding - just that the > person accepts - simple voting is the true test in my > personal opinion. And in a crowd as vocal as this I trust > that issues are raised in time to make sure that seconding is > non essential filtering mechanism. > > But that is a personal opinion - not the nessesarily shared > by the voting volunteers opinion of that of the board or pmc. > > So for next time 2003 - you have some options. > > 1- No seconding needed - just acceptance. > 2- One seconding needed - and acceptance counts > as such too. > 3- More than one needed. > 4- None needed - except to override a veto.. > 5. .... > > > Dw. > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:general-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
