On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > on 4/22/02 11:15 AM, "Michael A. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Speaking of which, why isn't torgue a top-level Jakarta subproject? Last > > I looked, it appeared to be completely independent of Turbine. Plus, as > > you say here, it also has a large developer and user base. Does the > > Torque community want to remain as part of Turbine for any particular > > reason? > > > > Just curious... > > > > regards, > > michael > > Torque has been separated for about a year now. > > We haven't found a reason to make it a top level project yet. > > I really don't understand why the location of a set of code matters. > > Get over the mental blocks and just use the code because it is good code, > good design, not because of what CVS repo it lives in.
I have no mental blocks for using it. When I found it about 4 or 5 months ago, I liked it. It is good code with a good design. The only issue I have is that I didn't know about it a year ago when it was first separated from Turbine, or even before that when I actually was looking for something like it. If the torque community doesn't want to move, that's up to them. The community is in charge. Just thought I'd ask. regards, michael -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
