You do have to admit it does seem a bit of a violation of orthogonality. Then again, I never really cared for helicopters anyhow ;-)
-Andy On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 17:35, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > on 4/22/02 2:27 PM, "Ellis Teer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I had considered using Torque before I was ready to give Turbine a try. > > Because it's subproject I had the impression that it was dependent on > > Turbine. This delayed me using it by a number of months. It's > > placement as a subproject in my case hurt its adoption. > > > > -Ellis Teer > > www.sitepen.com > > Never assume anything. All you had to do was take the extra effort to ask a > simple question. Don't blame us for your being lazy or confused. > > Also, at the top of the Torque page, it says: > > "Torque was developed as part of the Turbine Framework. It is now decoupled > and can be used by itself." > > -jon > > -- > Nixon: "At least with liquor, I don't lose motivation." > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- http://www.superlinksoftware.com http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - port of Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound Document format to java http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html - fix java generics! The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -Ambassador Kosh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
