Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Village abstracts JDBC, not databases. Torque uses Village in some > places in order to make the code cleaner and simpler.
After using them both for a couple years now, I've come to the conclusion that the database abstraction layer which Torque provides would be much more appropriate at a lower layer (i.e. housed in the layer which Village provides). This is one point (basically the only point) in favor of the CrossDB project. Though competition is good, I would rather have seen the CrossDB developers enhance an existing technology (like Village) than go off and start another project. All they've done is made it all the more difficult to integrate with O/R frameworks like Torque which use existing technology organized in a different manner which accomplishes the same thing. *sigh* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
