...and it would be foolish to argue with the 'right' angles of orthogonality. ;)
-Ellis Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > You do have to admit it does seem a bit of a violation of orthogonality. > Then again, I never really cared for helicopters anyhow ;-) > > -Andy > > > On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 17:35, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > >>on 4/22/02 2:27 PM, "Ellis Teer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>I had considered using Torque before I was ready to give Turbine a try. >>>Because it's subproject I had the impression that it was dependent on >>>Turbine. This delayed me using it by a number of months. It's >>>placement as a subproject in my case hurt its adoption. >>> >>>-Ellis Teer >>>www.sitepen.com >> >>Never assume anything. All you had to do was take the extra effort to ask a >>simple question. Don't blame us for your being lazy or confused. >> >>Also, at the top of the Torque page, it says: >> >>"Torque was developed as part of the Turbine Framework. It is now decoupled >>and can be used by itself." >> >>-jon >> >>-- >>Nixon: "At least with liquor, I don't lose motivation." >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
