I had considered using Torque before I was ready to give Turbine a try. Because it's subproject I had the impression that it was dependent on Turbine. This delayed me using it by a number of months. It's placement as a subproject in my case hurt its adoption.
-Ellis Teer www.sitepen.com Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > on 4/22/02 11:15 AM, "Michael A. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Speaking of which, why isn't torgue a top-level Jakarta subproject? Last >>I looked, it appeared to be completely independent of Turbine. Plus, as >>you say here, it also has a large developer and user base. Does the >>Torque community want to remain as part of Turbine for any particular >>reason? >> >>Just curious... >> >>regards, >>michael > > > Torque has been separated for about a year now. > > We haven't found a reason to make it a top level project yet. > > I really don't understand why the location of a set of code matters. > > Get over the mental blocks and just use the code because it is good code, > good design, not because of what CVS repo it lives in. > > -jon > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
