From: "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If commit numbers are not so important (and I agree), then why measure them > > at all? > > If commit numbers are not so important (and I agree), what is the way that > this community has to decide whether a person is a committer or not, given > that as it is today, you're not recognized as a member of this community if > you don't have a CVS account, and your name is not listed in $CVSROOT/avail
What is the way that *any* community decides in voting? You *are* a member of the community even if you do not have an account. http://xml.apache.org/roles.html : " Developers Developers are the people who write code or documentation patches or contribute positively to the project in other ways. A developer's contribution is always recognized. In source code, all developers who contribute to a source file may add their name to the list of authors for that file. " A developer *is* part of the community. This is how it works on the Cocoon, Forrest and POI projects AFAIK. It seems that you are trying to put on paper that developers that are not committers have to be listed. It can be done, but why? -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
