"Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It does have the right to vote, but it's not binding (at least this is what
> Stefano told me two weeks ago).
>
> I don't want developers that are not committers to vote: a vote is important
> for the future of the project, and the future of Apache.
>
> Should we give votes to developers that are not interested in the future of
> Apache?
Nope, we shouldn't but we should give it to those who ARE interested in the
future of Jakarta, or XML, and _do_stuff_ for those project, but are not
"bound" to a particular codebase. We should change our "meter" from being
you contribute CODE to the project, to you contribure WORK to the project.
That's at least what I (and others) think should happen. I'll try to put
together a more "formal" proposal in the next few hours/days (now it's cats
time, food and entertainment is required by my two furry creeps)...
Pier
--
[Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different
sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with
the readability of PostScript. [Jamie Zawinski - DNA Lounge - San Francisco]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
