> As a slight aside, getting on the PMC list just means nudging an existing > member and pointing out that you are an active committer to Jakarta.
Do you feel that we'll still be an open source organization in more than name if all decisions end up being made on private PMC lists not open to the public? -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with everything espoused in the above email. > From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 23:01:11 -0500 (EST) > To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Just in case you're curious > > > subjects have been: > > how the PMC should work > organising a vote or something for a new pmc chair [5 or 6 people nominated so > far] > how to ensure oversight of jakarta > general ramblings about jakarta futures in terms of TLPs and whether > social pressure should ever be applied to move a project to TLP-ness > [it shouldn't seems the end result here] > how to get more CLA's signed by committers > log4j has asked for TLP-ness, and the board voted in favour today > whether there should be a policy for jakarta wiki's, though it off-topic'd a > bit > > Some could have started on this list. Others could easily have moved to > this list after they went on, but moving to a new list is confusing to the > thread. Hopefully that'll improve, I'm sure Andy will be able to point out > at the start of threads when things should move to here. Some threads > did anyway. > > As a slight aside, getting on the PMC list just means nudging an existing > member and pointing out that you are an active committer to Jakarta. > > Hen > > On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > >> The reason everything is quiet here is all decisions are being made on >> private lists now. >> -- >> Andrew C. Oliver >> http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp >> Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI >> >> http://jakarta.apache.org/poi >> For Java and Excel, Got POI? >> >> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost >> definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its >> general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with >> everything espoused in the above email. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
