On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Edward Yakop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Hendy Irawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Hopefully there's nothing that our (OPS4J's) artifacts need from SSER. > > > > I think I used latest spring-osgi-test (1.1.0-m1) for pax-wicket that > > is not available in repo1.maven.org. > > If it's possible, let's only synchronize artifacts that are not > > integration tests to repo1.maven.org. > > > >> To get back to the initial discussion, it seems that there's no good > >> solution for Equinox at this time. You guys need to host Equinox at your > own > >> (OPS4J) repository, bcuz there's no such thing as official Equinox maven > >> repo yet. We may need to persuade Orbit guys to work on this, but it's > not a > >> dependable solution. > > > > If I remember correctly, spring application platform depends on equinox. > > If this true, the latest equinox jar should be on spring source maven2 > > repository. > > > > A quick search: > > > http://www.springsource.com/repository/app/bundle/version/detail?name=org.eclipse.osgi&version=3.4.0.v20080326&searchType=bundles&searchQuery=equinox > > This are only 2 versions of equinox and we support 4. And I do not > want to be at the mercy of SpringSource regarding when they make > available a new system bundle from equinox. > I have to agree with Alin. Inside SpringSource, Spring (Framework) and SSER (BRITS) seem to be managed by different divisions, and have slightly different purposes too. While SSER caters to S2AP, Spring itself still tries to be server-neutral. I use SSER mainly as a convenience repository. Some stuff, like Groovy, in SSER they only have the v1.5.1 OSGi wrapper available. While the latest version is 1.5.6. And if anyone is interested (I sure do!), beginning from (upcoming) Groovy 1.5.7 and 1.6-beta2 Groovy is "OSGi-fied" already, tested by yours truly. ( http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GROOVY-2863) ;-) no more pax-wrap-jar -a groovy hahahaha... P.S.: As useful as pax-wrap-jar is as a tool, and I really feel thankful for everyone involved (esp. Jayway Malaysia), I really am looking for pax-wrap-jar's "demise" (i.e. someday when we live in a perfect world where all JARs are osgified... ;-) -- Best regards, Hendy Irawan
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
