On Thursday 21 February 2008, lurker wrote:
> On 21/02/08 18:55, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> > lurker wrote:
> >> But even if that fixes it, I would very much like to know what was going
> >> on. From my debugging I have pretty much confirmed that it's that
> >> find/cpio call that fails, but I cannot grasp why at all. Few bugs have
> >> left me this perplexed.
> >
> > We are right in the middle of a release cycle with a couple of people
> > doing repeated catalyst builds, and nobody is hitting this bug.
> I know. I've had this problem since ~november, and the only other person
> that have reported something similar is Åsmund. It would be interesting
> if he could elaborate on the circumstances he got it in...

I did, in fact, get it building i686 on an amd64 platform. Everything worked 
perfectly until, I assume, I updated my portage snapshot. I can't recall 
having done anything else that should affect the build, but since I could 
work around the problem when I located it, I didn't take the time to 
investigate further (or submit a bug, since I felt there were too many 
potential factors at the time).

Åsmund Grammeltvedt
Snap TV

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to