On Sunday 19 October 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Now into it's Nth great year, I bring you the fourth edition of the > automatic assignment proposal. </truman-show> > > Previously: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48485 [v1] > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/49601 [v2] > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/57159 [v3] > > Bleeding edge prototype: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~rbu/assign.py > MANY thanks to rbu. > > If there are no further changes or objections at this time, it would > be nice to implement this by the end of November.
I updated the assign.py with suggestions from this thread, in particular: * maintainer/herd elements in categories' metadata.xml are respected * Anything that looks like a CAT/PN in the string is caught if it is either a valid CAT/PN or valid CAT * Order in metadata.xml is what dictates assignee, i.e.: The first herd or maintainer listed in the metadata.xml of the first CAT or CAT/PN is who is assignee, all other follow as CC. What are the next steps for this to go forward? Robert
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.