On Monday 01 May 2006 11:03 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Monday 01 May 2006 07:55 am, Justin Patrin wrote: > >> On 4/30/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Kesara Rathnayake wrote: > >> (I hate HTML mail....and I hate Outlook even more.) > > > > Outlook and Outlook Express are the two worst mail clients in the > > universe. > > They are not. Lotus Notes beats them to that.
Ouch. You sure you want to be handing out a judgement of that magnitude like that? It'd take quite a bit to be worse than Outlook. > > They're too slow > > Not really. You must not have used them. I have. They are. End of story. > > and bloated to do anything, and they don't accept ANYTHING > > other than MS Exchange server > > Wrt. Outlook Express, that's plain wrong. And wrt. Outlook: It's > wrong as well. Outlook CAN interface IMAP servers. But you'll > lose all the benefits of Outlook in this case. I said that they can't interface with non-MS Exchange servers withour throwing a Royal Temper Tantrum. They do not like POP. They like IMAP even less. Plus, of all the HTML-sending mail clients, Outlook is the worst! It makes the biggest, most bloated HTML I've ever seen!
pgpQY42Hi61Xf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
