Many second-growth forests are still increasing their carbon stocks. I think that's the argument being made.
Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 11, 2015, at 7:38 PM, David desJardins <[email protected]> wrote: > > forest has to be carbon-balanced, it isn't removing net carbon from the > atmosphere but essentially all of the carbon taken up by plants eventually > gets returned to the atmosphere when those -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
