That seems like the important argument, John. Are there any simple metrics
we can use to think about the best way to optimize soil carbon in a
particular biome?  And, are there realistic totals that we could say those
optimized situations represent in the US, or even the world?


--  
Roger D. Aines

Fuel Cycle Innovations Program Leader

E Programs, Global Security

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Mail Stop L-090  Livermore, CA 94551

925 423-7184
925 998-2915 cell

 

Administrative Contact

Michelle Herawi [email protected]

925 423-4964

 







On 2/12/15 7:49 AM, "John Harte" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Remember: forests = trees + soil + microbes +Š  Much of the carbon is in
>the soil and converting meadow/grasslands/prairie to some kinds of forest
>or woody shrubland can result in net carbon loss even as the woody plants
>grow.  World wide 4 or 5 times as much carbon in soil as in all living
>biomass.  
>
>
>John Harte
>Professor of Ecosystem Sciences
>ERG/ESPM
>310 Barrows Hall
>University of California
>Berkeley, CA 94720  USA
>[email protected]
>
>
>
>On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:37 AM, "Robert H. Socolow" <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> Many second-growth forests are still increasing their carbon stocks. I
>>think that's the argument being made.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Feb 11, 2015, at 7:38 PM, David desJardins <[email protected]>
>>>wrote:
>>> 
>>> forest has to be carbon-balanced, it isn't removing net carbon from
>>>the atmosphere but essentially all of the carbon taken up by plants
>>>eventually gets returned to the atmosphere when those
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>Groups "geoengineering" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>an email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>"geoengineering" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>email to [email protected].
>To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to