Still not really asking the right questions. Building a digital parcel ecosystem is much larger than web platform tech choices. Otherwise it becomes moot without the content.
Josh Lieberman On Jan 16, 2011, at 14:15, Puneet Kishor <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sunday, January 16, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Bucci, David G wrote: > >> Not an Apple fan, AM an SU fan, so I’ll play orange for this round. Of >> different product selections (FOSS, COTS, GOTS in this case, I suppose) to >> use as the base for the project that was described, was what I was thinking. >> > > The question is still too broad, too generic. Selections and technology are > secondary. What you want to accomplish is primary. If there is something that > a software/technology cannot do, and *that* is exactly what you need to do, > then you *have* to look elsewhere. > > How about restricting the scope of the inquiry -- perhaps a tradeoff between > different map servers, or between different spatial data storage mechanisms, > heck, perhaps even between Windows or Unix or, ahem, cough, Macs. Just trying > to figure out the difference between FOSS, COTS, GOTS (I have no idea what > the heck GOTS is, but I gots some COTS and FOSS) without specifying the > capabilities one wishes to deliver is a very amorphous exercise. >> >> >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Puneet Kishor >> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 1:52 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Geowanking] EXTERNAL: Re: Web-based geoservices for state >> government >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sunday, January 16, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Bucci, David G wrote: >> >> Stepping back, does anyone know of any published studies where somebody >> (without an ax to grind) really surveyed the marketplace and did a tradeoff >> analysis? >> >> .. >> >> >> >> >> >> Everyone has an axe to grind, no matter how blunt the axe might be. >> >> >> >> That said, analysis of tradeoff between what and what, asked the apple of >> the orange? >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Puneet Kishor >> >> Sent with Sparrow >> > > _______________________________________________ > Geowanking mailing list > [email protected] > http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
_______________________________________________ Geowanking mailing list [email protected] http://geowanking.org/mailman/listinfo/geowanking_geowanking.org
