I am positive she is a LCP Agouti. She has had four litters and all have
been Golden Agouti. I recently bred her son (Golden Agouti) back to her to
see what would come out and I got four Golden Agouti babies and three LCP
Agouti. Does this sound about right??

Thanks in advance,
Victoria


-----Original Message-----
From: Gerbil Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Evans
Sent: 11 December 2001 19:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pearl genetics


She is most possibly CP Grey Agouti(aka Pearl) or Polar Fox. For some
reason I doubt she's CP Agouti.

So if you have an Ivory (Cream) - A*CCE*ggpp

and all you have from their first litter is golden agoutis. A*C*E*G*P*

Polar Fox is A*C*eegg*P
Pearl(CP Grey Agouti) is A*cbcbE*ggP*


Both of these have the gg gene, which would basically eliminate any
possibility of Golden Agouti.


IF she is a LCP Agouti (A*cbcbE*G*P*)... and as I recall Polar Fox
and CP Agouti don't really look the same. As I recall, a LCP Agouti
has much less obvious ticking than a Polar Fox or Pearl, and the body
color is a bit yellow-er. Correct me if I'm wrong. But if she IS a
LCP Agouti, then it IS possible to have all Golden Agouti pups.

I suppose the only way to find out for sure, is let them have a few
more litters, and see what else pops out. If you have nothing but
golden agouti, then I think it is safe to say you have a LCP Agouti
on your hands. If other colors pop out, then perhaps it's time to
look over the genetics again.

Good luck!

-Jackie


>The buck certainly looks like an Ivory Cream. He is almost white in colour
>but has a very creamy sheen to his coat. I have looked at the colour pallet
>and this is the picture that looks like him most.
>
>The doe I was told is either a Pearl, a Light Colourpoint Agouti or a Polar
>Fox. She is white in colouring with dark (black going down the hair shaft
to
>brown) ticking. Which do you think she is? I would send a picture of them
>both, but I don't think I can send attachments to this list!
>
>Thanks in advance!
>
>Victoria
>

Reply via email to