someone told me (translation follows):
"Ich rendere in einen Puffer alloziert via malloc. Am Ende schreibe ich den
Inhalt via ggiPutBox in die Grafikkarte (Video-RAM).
Im neuen Design verwende ich statt nen eigenen Puffer ein
memory-visual, dessen Inhalt via ggiCrossBlit auf ein default-visual
kopiert wird. => Speed up um den Faktor 10."
Translation:
"I render into a buffer allocated with malloc. at the end i write
its content with a ggiPutBox to the graphics card (video-ram).
in my new design i use an a memory-visual instead of the own
buffer and do a ggiCrossBlit to a default-visual
=> Speed up by factor 10."
i cannot believe this.
i really do not understand why this should be true.
i thought if i cannot get directbuffer the fastest way
is use malloced buffer and do ggiPutBox.
why should the CrossBlit be faster, even though it should
do EXACTLY the same ?
cu
erik
--
Name: Erik Thiele \\\\
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] o `QQ'_
IRC: erikyyy / __8
WWW: http://www.erikyyy.de/ ' `
