Well, I strongly dislike having an eraser tool that
behaves differently based on a property of an image
you can't even see. It really stinks.
What I'd prefer to see is a "replace color" paint tool
that can handle bgs or any other layer the way eraser
works now on a bg layer.
Keeping the user experience the same between versions
is not a good thing when the user experience sucks.
Seth
--- Zachary Beane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 01:42:06PM +0100, Jens
> Lautenbacher wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > I'd vote for always having an alpha layer. seems
> to be cleaner
> > conceptually.
>
> I'd vote AGAINST this. Imagine if you use GIMP
> without any layer
> functionality, and suddenly you find that cut &
> erase change to do
> different things in version 1.4, and the only way to
> get them back to
> normal (for you) is through a strange hack involving
> multi-colored
> layers.
>
> I do like the idea of implicit alpha on the
> operations Sven
> mentioned...
>
> Zach
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zachary Beane
> http://www.xach.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Gimp-developer mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
